SIS Practice Connections

Practice Connections Publication

Featured Article

Promoting Family Centered Practice in the Pediatric Oncology Setting Through Program Development: Expansion of Therapy to Go

Jessica McNatt, MOTR/L 08/24/2026

08/24/2026

Purpose of the Program

Occupational therapy (OT) contributes to the holistic care of young children with cancer through family-centered practice. Family-centered practice recognizes caregivers as essential partners in the therapeutic process, emphasizing collaboration and equipping families with the knowledge and resources needed to support their child’s participation in meaningful occupations beyond direct therapy sessions (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2020).  In the pediatric oncology setting, family-centered practice is vital to a patient’s developmental growth, as children enduring catastrophic diseases such as cancer are often limited in their occupational engagement by environmental and personal barriers. Caregivers play a critical role in supporting developmental experiences throughout a child’s cancer journey. Equipping families with meaningful, developmentally appropriate activities can promote continued participation in everyday occupations such as play.

For a child, engagement in play is crucial to achieving developmental milestones. Play is defined in the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework as “active engagement in an activity that is intrinsically motivated, internally controlled, and freely chosen and that may include the suspension of reality” (AOTA, 2020 p. 34). For children receiving cancer treatment, play is not only a source of enjoyment but also a primary means through which developmental skills are established and maintained. Therefore, ensuring opportunities for play despite medical challenges is an important component of pediatric oncology rehabilitation.

Context is the term used to describe the various patient-specific factors related to environmental and personal barriers (AOTA, n.d.). Each patient encountered by occupational therapists has a unique combination of environmental and personal factors within their context that influences participation in desired occupations such as play. “Environmental factors are aspects of the physical, social, and attitudinal surroundings in which people live and conduct their lives. Personal factors are the background of a person’s life and living and consist of the unique features of the person that are not part of a health condition or health state” (AOTA, 2020).

Understanding the influence of these environmental and personal factors is essential because they directly affect a child’s opportunities to engage in play, emphasizing the need for family-centered interventions that promote developmental participation across treatment settings. In this population, barriers to engagement in play may include the type of treatment received, sedation, hospitalization, housing arrangements, and access to available support.

Engagement in play can be greatly disrupted for the pediatric oncology population, resulting in the underdevelopment of their performance skills during this phase of required medical care (Sparrow et al., 2023). Although occupational therapy addresses developmental needs during direct intervention, caregivers often have limited resources to support therapeutic play and developmental skill acquisition outside of therapy sessions. To address these contextual barriers and extend developmental support beyond direct intervention, Therapy to Go was developed using principles from the Developmental Frame of Reference and the Model of Playfulness (Bundy, 1997; Kramer & Hinojosa, 2010).

This family-centered program provides patients with developmentally appropriate items that facilitate developmental skill attainment. The contents of each Therapy to Go kit are individualized to the needs of the patient and are also influenced by recommendations received from rehabilitation staff involved in the patient’s care.  Each kit includes developmentally stimulating play items and associated educational handouts that provide caregivers with practical strategies for using the materials to support their child’s development throughout oncology treatment.

Development of the Program

The Therapy to Go program evolved from a needs-based assessment that was conducted by assessing needs and gaps in the occupational therapy service delivery for young children receiving oncology- related treatment. Information was gathered through interdisciplinary collaboration with occupational therapists, speech therapists, physical therapists, and caregivers.

This collaboration aimed to identify barriers affecting children’s opportunities for developmental play and occupational engagement during oncology treatment. The needs-based assessment revealed gaps between scheduled therapy sessions and children’s daily routines across inpatient, outpatient, and home settings. Although children received direct rehabilitation services, families often lacked developmentally appropriate materials to support milestone acquisition outside of therapy. Treatment-related factors, including fatigue, medical procedures, hospitalizations, and abrupt transitions from home communities for specialized care, further limited access to familiar toys and opportunities for meaningful play. These findings demonstrated a need for accessible developmental materials that families could use across settings to promote continued play, participation, and developmental progress.

The program began by supporting the needs of children presenting at an age range of 0–3 years. Appropriate developmental toy items were identified by collaborating with occupational therapists, speech therapists, and physical therapists. The following items were selected for inclusion in the Therapy to Go kits for these children: a puzzle, wooden blocks, a textured ball, a push-pull toy, a string with beads, a ring stacker, paper with large crayons, a rattle, and first word picture cards.

Patients were eligible for the Therapy to Go program if they were newly referred to rehabilitation services (occupational, physical, or speech therapy) and demonstrated developmental skills within the birth-to-3-year age range. The treating therapist identified eligible patients, collaborated with the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team to determine individualized developmental needs, and submitted desired items needed for patient to the program manager.

The contents of each Therapy to Go kit were tailored to the child’s developmental needs and existing therapy goals, ensuring that each family received materials that were meaningful and relevant to their child’s plan of care. Once assembled, the kit was delivered to the treating therapist, who introduced the program to the family during a treatment session. Therapists demonstrated the recommended play activities, reviewed the purpose of each item, and incorporated the materials into the child’s home exercise program while providing caregivers with opportunities to practice the activities and ask questions.

Families kept the Therapy to Go kit to support developmental play across treatment settings, including the hospital, temporary housing, and the home. Each item included a QR code linking caregivers to an online resource with detailed instructions and additional play ideas to encourage continued engagement outside of therapy sessions.

Expansion of Therapy to Go: Young School Age

In pediatric oncology, the environmental factors impede the continuum of advancement of developmental milestones because of the complex medical treatment required by the patients. This can result in patients being away from in-person learning and group play opportunities. Because of these known factors, it is crucial that we as practitioners fill the gaps to promote continued advancement.

Occupational Therapy Practitioners (OTPs) have a vital role in the cancer care continuum to ensure that children are engaging and participating in age-appropriate development and meaningful activities of daily living (ADLs). OTPs should increase providers’ awareness of available services and programming to specifically promote age-appropriate skills in pediatric oncology patients (Braveman & Newman, 2025).

As a result of this knowledge and from the needs-based assessment that was previously completed it was evident that expanding the program was vital and that continuing to fill the gap of providing family-centered care in the pediatric oncology setting was crucial. The results of an additional needs-based assessment utilizing feedback from parents indicated that, in the pediatric oncology setting, there was a large gap related to family-centered practice and continued advancement in developmental skills for patients aged 4–6 years.

The literature shows that many developmental milestones continue to be advanced through the ages of 4–6 years. According to the Peabody Motor Developmental Chart, a child in this age range should be able to demonstrate the skills listed in Table 1.

In addition to the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, developmental expectations outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were used to guide expansion of the Therapy to Go program. The CDC developmental milestone checklists provide age-specific expectations across social-emotional, language and communication, cognitive, and motor domains (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2026). Incorporating these milestones ensured that Therapy to Go materials promoted development across multiple areas of occupation and aligned with expected developmental skills for each age group. Examples of developmental milestones expected by 4-6 years of age are provided in Table 2.

Through the needs-based assessment, the category of “young school-aged” children was developed, reflecting the needs of patients aged 4–6 years. Therapy to Go for patients in this category provides the items shown in Figure 1.

For each item provided through the Therapy to Go program, there is a corresponding activity sheet accessible through a QR code. This provides parents with information regarding the item as well as ideas on how to play with it. The information on each activity sheet was created through collaboration with speech therapists, physical therapists, and colleagues from the Occupational Therapy department. Figure 2 shows the activity sheet for the scissor skills activity pad:

Conclusion and Plans

It is planned to expand the Therapy to Go program to all age ranges to benefit our specific population of pediatric oncology patients. The Therapy to Go program is easily accessible through QR codes, for both the 0–3-years and 4-6 years age category. Having appropriate information for a given age range category available on the Together by St. Jude website, which is an online educational resource providing families and caregivers with resources throughout a child’s care journey. Providing the Therapy to Go activity sheets on the Together website will enable families to easily locate information pertaining to advancing developmental milestones, thereby promoting age-appropriate skills and toy items to patients in the home setting. The continued advancement of the program demonstrates the need for and importance of OTPs in advancing programming focusing on family-centered practice in the pediatric oncology setting.

Case Example

This case study is an example of a patient who would qualify for the Therapy to Go program as expanded to serve young school-aged children:

Brody is a male patient who is 5 years of age with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma. He presents to St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital for cancer treatment. His family has traveled from out of state, which limited the items they were able to bring with them. He will be at St. Jude for 6 weeks then will return home for a 4-week break before returning to St. Jude for 6–8 months to receive oncology-related treatment according to his medical plan of care. He is receiving occupational therapy, speech therapy, and physical therapy services at St. Jude. Brody has undergone surgery to remove a mass, resulting in right-hand ataxia, diplopia, and overall decreased balance. He was referred by his occupational therapist for the Therapy to Go program, and the following items were provided: therapy putty, a scissor skills activity (with handy scoopers also provided), a color shape sorter, an animal puzzle, a handwriting workbook, and a scavenger hunt. The activity sheets were provided for each item. Following interdisciplinary collaboration, the occupational therapist introduced the Therapy to Go program during an occupational therapy treatment session.

Comprehensive parent education was provided regarding each item included in the program, including hands-on demonstration of activities with the patient to promote caregiver carryover. Parents also received QR codes linked to corresponding activity sheets, allowing convenient access to instructions and ideas for incorporating each item into daily routines.

The Therapy to Go program was designed to support continued participation in therapeutic activities within the family’s housing environment as well as during any subsequent inpatient hospitalizations. To evaluate implementation and address any questions, the occupational therapist completed follow-up with the family to assess frequency of use and provide additional guidance as needed.

Parents reported positive feedback regarding the program. They indicated that their child engaged with the Therapy to Go activities approximately two to three times per week, with the scavenger hunt being his favorite activity. The family shared, “We feel that the program has increased his engagement in tasks he has not been interested in since surgery.” This feedback suggests that the program promoted meaningful participation in therapeutic activities beyond the clinical setting while supporting caregiver confidence and home-based carryover.

Conclusion

Overall, this case study demonstrates the potential value of the Therapy to Go program in supporting participation beyond the traditional therapy setting, particularly within the pediatric oncology population. Children and families undergoing cancer treatment are often displaced from their typical environments for extended periods, resulting in decreased opportunities for play and engagement in meaningful occupations. The positive caregiver feedback received in this case suggests that the Therapy to Go program helped bridge this gap by increasing the child’s engagement in activities that had previously declined following surgery.

Although this report represents a single case, it highlights the importance of identifying barriers to occupational engagement outside of therapy sessions and developing innovative, family-centered interventions to address those barriers. Programs such as Therapy to Go have the potential to extend the reach of occupational therapy beyond the clinic or hospital room by empowering caregivers with the resources and confidence to facilitate therapeutic play and skill development within natural environments.

Occupational therapy practitioners are uniquely positioned to evaluate their own clinical settings, identify unmet needs, and develop creative, evidence-informed solutions that enhance continuity of care. By addressing gaps in service delivery, practitioners can promote occupational participation and strengthen family-centered care.

Occupational therapy practitioners should critically examine their own practice and consider opportunities to expand the impact of occupational therapy beyond direct treatment sessions. Integrating family-centered, occupation-based programs into everyday practice has the potential to improve carryover and ultimately enhance outcomes for children and their families.

References

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational Therapy Practice      

Framework: Domain and Process—Fourth Edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), 7412410010p1-7412410010p87. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001

 American Occupational Therapy Association. (n.d.). Domain and process: Contexts. Retrieved July 25, 2026, from https://www.aota.org/practice/domain-and-process/contexts

Braveman, B., & Newman, R. (2025). Cancer and Occupational Therapy: Enabling Performance and Participation Across the Lifespan. American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

Bundy, A. C. (1997). Play and playfulness: What to look for. In L. D. Parham & L. S. Fazio (Eds.), Play in occupational therapy for children (pp. 52–66).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026, May 15). Milestones by 4 years. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/act-early/milestones/4-years.html

Kramer, P., & Hinojosa, J. (Eds.). (2010). Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Sparrow, J., Dagen, H., Harris, A., Schwartzberg, S., Weathers, L., Kibby, M., Harman, J. L., & Jacola, L. M. (2023). Occupational therapy: an essential component of support for young children with cancer. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 43(12), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492221115060

Stokes, N. A., Deitz, J. L., & Crowe, T. K. (1990). The Peabody

Developmental Fine Motor Scale: An interrater reliability study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.4.334

Jessica McNatt, OTR/L, formerly an Occupational Therapist at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

PAST ARTICLES

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Occupational Therapy’s Role in the Inclusion of Gay Fathers in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

LaTonya Seldon, MS, OTR/L, CNT, ATP

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Role of Occupational Therapy in School-Based Practice and Mental Health

Jordan Earley, MS, OTR/L & Haven Herndon, MS, OTR/L

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Using the 5Ts for Teach Back in Pediatric Occupational Therapy: A Case Example

Sue Ram, OTD, OTR/L

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Pediatric Orthopedic Occupational Therapy:

A Holistic Approach to Care

Amy Sitabkhan, OTR, OTD, Treva Smith, OTR, MOT, Grace Evasco, OTR, MOT

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Answering the Call: A Pediatric Mentoring Program

Beth Elenko, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, CLA, FAOTA & Carey Minard, MAEd, OTD, OTR/L

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Using the early skills vocational program documentation form in school-based occupational therapy

Sarah DiMeo, PhD, OTR/L 02/01/2025

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Working with bilingual children: When to recommend speech therapy

Mary Christensen, MA, CCC-SLP 11/01/2024

unhappy child crying

Photo by George Pak on Pexels.com

CHILDREN & YOUTH

Tools for cognitive, emotional, and sensory regulation in pediatrics

Jessica McHugh Conlin, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, CPT, Pn1; and Aimee Piller, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, FAOTA 08/01/2024

Share this page with your colleagues

Facebook
X